Let's be honest: no one really liked the book. That much is perfectly clear. However, that doesn't mean that the book was bad at conveying its meaning as a work of literature. It's supposed to be relevent to the topic of this year, and, though I hate to say it, Dr. deGravelles wasn't wrong to fund us these tlhh
The purpose of this novel is to chronicle the story of Tambu and her struggles through life. Being a woman, she has to face more setbacks than men. Therefore, she has to work even harder than them to win approval from the others.
It may pain me to say this, but... I think Nervous Conditions actually helped us in English. It relates very well with our overarching question, and has the correct theme to be focusing on.
I know that everyone hated this book for one reason or another. However. It's not our like the book, only give determine whether the book was successful in that area. And... As far as I'm concerned, it won't be a problem understanding it or anything.
The issue students will face next year will be more about the book as a whole (how boring it is). I've no doubt this will happen. But, when it comes to post colonial influence, I think Nervous Conditions takes the cake.
I hate to agree with the fact, but I too disliked the book. I too did learn a few things, despite not particularly liking it either. Good post, I like your comment about how successful the book was in assisting us.
ReplyDeleteI feel the same way. While at certain points my interests as a reader peaked above zero, for the most part, it was forced. But, it completes what's necessary for the curriculum quite well.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with you. The book was not the best but how it answered the question for the year was very good. Good post.
ReplyDelete